ADF to defend life in Swiss 'doctor-prescribed death' case at European high court
Woman with no fatal disease sued Switzerland for refusing to provide her with suicide drugs
Wednesday, Mar 21, 2012
ADF attorney sound bites: Paul Coleman #1 | Paul Coleman #2
STRASBOURG, France — The European Court of Human Rights is allowing Alliance Defense Fund attorneys to intervene to defend life in a lawsuit filed against the Swiss government. A woman who does not suffer from any fatal disease sued Switzerland after Swiss authorities would not provide her with drugs to commit suicide.
“The government has an obligation to protect life, not facilitate death,” said ADF Legal Counsel Paul Coleman. “Claims to personal autonomy do not override national laws which are designed to protect the weak and vulnerable. This position is supported by the European Court’s existing case law and is enshrined in the European Convention on Human Rights.”
According to a submission ADF filed with the court Tuesday, “The clear jurisprudence of the Court is that there is no right to assisted suicide or euthanasia under the Convention, nor are there any positive obligations on the State in regard to these issues, save the positive duty on the States to protect life under Article 2.”
Although Switzerland is one of only four European countries to allow doctor-prescribed death in certain circumstances, individuals can obtain sodium pentobarbital, a drug that can be used to commit suicide, only after a medical examination and prescription by a doctor.
Alda Gross, a Swiss citizen, failed to find a doctor prepared to prescribe the lethal substance to her, so she appealed to the national courts in 2009. The Swiss courts held that the restrictive conditions placed on the drug are in place to prevent abuse and cannot be overridden in the absence of a medical prescription. The national courts also noted that Gross “does not suffer from a fatal disease, but has simply expressed her wish to die because of her advanced age and her growing fragility.”
“It is already disturbing that individuals in Switzerland can gain access to lethal substances through medical doctors who are supposed to help preserve life,” said Coleman. “If drugs designed to end life become available without a prescription, as Ms. Gross is arguing for in this case, it will put the lives of thousands of people at extraordinary risk.”
The Gross v. Switzerland case is the latest attempt to create a “right” to assisted suicide under the European Convention. Last year, in the very similar case Haas v. Switzerland, the European Court of Human Rights unanimously rejected the claim that the country had an obligation to assist individuals in committing suicide.
The Alliance Defense Fund is also intervening in a similar case, Koch v. Germany, currently before the Fifth Section of the European Court of Human Rights.
“The government has an obligation to protect life, not facilitate death,” said ADF Legal Counsel Paul Coleman. “Claims to personal autonomy do not override national laws which are designed to protect the weak and vulnerable. This position is supported by the European Court’s existing case law and is enshrined in the European Convention on Human Rights.”
According to a submission ADF filed with the court Tuesday, “The clear jurisprudence of the Court is that there is no right to assisted suicide or euthanasia under the Convention, nor are there any positive obligations on the State in regard to these issues, save the positive duty on the States to protect life under Article 2.”
Although Switzerland is one of only four European countries to allow doctor-prescribed death in certain circumstances, individuals can obtain sodium pentobarbital, a drug that can be used to commit suicide, only after a medical examination and prescription by a doctor.
Alda Gross, a Swiss citizen, failed to find a doctor prepared to prescribe the lethal substance to her, so she appealed to the national courts in 2009. The Swiss courts held that the restrictive conditions placed on the drug are in place to prevent abuse and cannot be overridden in the absence of a medical prescription. The national courts also noted that Gross “does not suffer from a fatal disease, but has simply expressed her wish to die because of her advanced age and her growing fragility.”
“It is already disturbing that individuals in Switzerland can gain access to lethal substances through medical doctors who are supposed to help preserve life,” said Coleman. “If drugs designed to end life become available without a prescription, as Ms. Gross is arguing for in this case, it will put the lives of thousands of people at extraordinary risk.”
The Gross v. Switzerland case is the latest attempt to create a “right” to assisted suicide under the European Convention. Last year, in the very similar case Haas v. Switzerland, the European Court of Human Rights unanimously rejected the claim that the country had an obligation to assist individuals in committing suicide.
The Alliance Defense Fund is also intervening in a similar case, Koch v. Germany, currently before the Fifth Section of the European Court of Human Rights.
- Pronunciation guide: Gross (GROHS’), Koch (COAK’)
ADF is a legal alliance of Christian attorneys and like-minded organizations defending the right of people to freely live out their faith. Launched in 1994, ADF employs a unique combination of strategy, training, funding, and litigation to protect and preserve religious liberty, the sanctity of life, marriage, and the family.
www.adfmedia.org | twitter.com/adfmedia | Ref. 36821