Skip to main content

Young Americans for Liberty at University of Massachusetts Amherst v. Manning

Description:  The University of Massachusetts Amherst had a highly restrictive speech policy that restricted all “speeches and rallies” to less than one percent of campus and only between noon and 1 p.m. each day.


Monday, Jan 8, 2018
SPRINGFIELD, Mass. – Alliance Defending Freedom attorneys representing a student and the campus chapter of Young Americans for Liberty filed a federal lawsuit Monday against the University of Massachusetts Amherst for its highly restrictive speech policy. The policy restricts all “speeches and rallies” to less than one percent of campus and only between noon and 1 p.m. each day.

The policy doesn’t define “speech” or “rally,” instead leaving that decision up to the discretion of university officials and opening the door to unconstitutional discrimination based on a student group’s viewpoint. Giving a speech or holding a rally outside of the small speech zone on the west side of the Student Union building and during hours other than between noon and 1 p.m. may result in sanctions up to and including expulsion from the university.

“A public university is hardly the marketplace of ideas that it’s supposed to be when the marketplace is less than one percent of campus and only open for one hour a day—and then only if university officials approve of your presence there,” said ADF Legal Counsel Caleb Dalton. “UMass-Amherst’s speech policy contains provisions similar to those that courts have repeatedly struck down as unconstitutional at other schools. If the university wishes to demonstrate its dedication to the free exchange of ideas, it can do so by fixing its policy so that it’s consistent with the First Amendment.”

The Speech Zone Policy specifically states, “Outdoor speeches and rallies during class hours may be held only on the west side (main entrance) of the Student Union Building, and shall be limited to one (1) hour in length, from noon to 1:00 p.m.”

Any “unauthorized presence in or use of University premises, facilities or property” constitutes a violation of the UMass Code of Student Conduct. Penalties for violations of the Code of Student Conduct range from a “warning” to expulsion from the university.

YAL and the student, Nicholas Consolini, desire to host and present speeches and to rally in other publicly accessible open areas of campus, but the policy subjects them to sanctions if they do so.

“Today’s college students will be tomorrow’s judges, legislators, and voters,” said ADF Senior Counsel Casey Mattox, director of the ADF Center for Academic Freedom. “Public universities should be teaching the value of our Constitution to their students, not ignoring it.”

ADF-allied attorney Andrew Beckwith of Massachusetts Family Institute is serving as local counsel in the case, Young Americans for Liberty at University of Massachusetts, Amherst v. Manning, filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts, Eastern Division.

The ADF Center for Academic Freedom is dedicated to ensuring freedom of speech and association for students and faculty so that everyone can freely participate in the marketplace of ideas without fear of government censorship.
 
# # # | Ref. 60693

Legal Documents

Complaint: Young Americans for Liberty at University of Massachusetts, Amherst v. Manning
Settlement agreement: : Young Americans for Liberty at University of Massachusetts Amherst v. Manning
Notice of voluntary dismissal: Young Americans for Liberty at University of Massachusetts Amherst v. Manning

Related Resources

ABOUT Caleb Dalton

Caleb Dalton serves as senior counsel with Alliance Defending Freedom's Center for Life, where he brings over a decade of civil rights litigation and public advocacy experience to the team, securing the rights of the unborn and those who advocate for them. Since joining ADF, Dalton has served on multiple teams representing private individuals and government entities to affirm the fundamental freedoms of speech and religious liberty. With ADF's Center for Conscience Initiatives, he played a key role in the successful petition for certiorari in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission at the U.S. Supreme Court. With the Center for Academic Freedom, he successfully represented students and faculty seeking to speak freely on public university campuses across the country. Dalton earned a J.D. at the Regent University School of Law, graduating cum laude. He is a member of the bar in Arizona, Virginia, and the District of Columbia; he is also admitted to practice before multiple federal district and appellate courts, including the U.S. Supreme Court.

ABOUT Tyson Langhofer

Tyson Langhofer serves as senior counsel with Alliance Defending Freedom and director of its Center for Academic Freedom. Before joining ADF, Langhofer was a partner with Stinson Leonard Street LLP, where he worked as a commercial litigation attorney for 15 years and earned Martindale-Hubbell’s AV Preeminent® rating. Langhofer earned his Juris Doctor from Regent University School of Law, where he graduated cum laude in 1999. He obtained a B.A. in international business with a minor in economics from Wichita State University in 1996. A member of the bar in Virginia, Kansas, and Arizona, Langhofer is also admitted to practice in numerous federal district courts.