Commonwealth of Virginia v. Ferriero
Description: Certain groups and states are seeking to ratify the Equal Rights Amendment even though Congress set a valid seven-year time limit for ratification that ended in 1979.
VA withdraws from baseless ERA ratification effort
RICHMOND, Va. – The commonwealth of Virginia has decided to reverse its legal position and withdraw from the lawsuit Commonwealth of Virginia v. Ferriero, which seeks to ratify the Equal Rights Amendment even though Congress set a valid seven-year deadline for ratification that ended in 1979.
“The Equal Rights Amendment has been legally dead for decades because its proponents failed to secure the required support from the states to amend the Constitution,” said ADF General Counsel Kristen Waggoner. “Virginia made the right decision to withdraw from this unsuccessful lawsuit that disrespects our nation’s constitutional amendment process and threatens women’s rights and opportunities. Even former Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg acknowledged that the push to sneak the ERA into the Constitution comes ‘long after the deadline passed.’ Virginia’s appropriate withdrawal from this litigation—which never should have been undertaken—respects the American people and the integrity of the Constitution.”
In July 2020, Alliance Defending Freedom attorneys filed a friend-of-the-court brief that urged the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia to affirm that the ERA ratification deadline had expired.
The ERA was a proposed amendment to the Constitution that is unnecessary, as the Constitution already grants the same rights to women as it grants to men. Rather than advancing equality, the ERA actually jeopardizes the many gains women have made in employment, education, and sports.
As ADF attorneys explain, the ERA would threaten equal rights for women by leaving the term “sex” open for misinterpretation so that men who identify as women could compete on women’s sports teams, and males could enter shelters designed to protect women who have suffered abuse, rape, and trafficking. Additionally, by leaving “sex” open for misinterpretation, the ERA invites courts to strike down many commonsense laws that benefit women including special accommodations for pregnant women in the workforce and military; government programs such as Women, Infants, and Children; and criminal protections via the Violence Against Women Act.
Further, the ERA could be misused to force Americans to pay for abortions with their tax dollars—including abortions up to the moment of birth—and to strike down even modest state protections for mothers and their unborn children, such as parental notification laws for minor girls seeking abortions and laws prohibiting abortions based on the baby’s sex.
Alliance Defending Freedom is an alliance-building, non-profit legal organization committed to protecting religious freedom, free speech, parental rights, and the sanctity of life.
# # #
Commentary
Previous News Releases
Legal Documents
Related Resources
As the CEO, president, and general counsel of Alliance Defending Freedom, Kristen Waggoner leads the faith-based organization in advancing every person's God-given right to live and speak the truth in the U.S. and around the world. She oversees more than 450 ADF team members in 10 global offices. Since 2011, ADF has won 15 cases at the U.S. Supreme Court, three of which were argued by Waggoner: Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission, Uzuebgunam v. Presczewski, and 303 Creative v. Elenis. ADF also has a strong record of international success at the European Court of Human Rights, United Nations, and other leading courts and tribunals and has secured the release of more than 1,000 imprisoned Christians. After clerking with Washington Supreme Court Justice Richard B. Sanders, Waggoner practiced law for over 16 years at a Seattle firm before joining ADF in 2013. She is Peer Review Rated AV® Preeminent™ in Martindale-Hubbell. Waggoner is a sought-after public speaker who often appears in national and international media outlets.