Skip to main content

Pittsburgh school district's proposed bathroom policy jeopardizes children's privacy, safety

ADF, DefendMyPrivacy.org letter explains that no law requires letting members of the opposite sex into public school bathrooms

Friday, Apr 22, 2016

Attorney sound bite:  Matt Sharp

PITTSBURGH – Alliance Defending Freedom and DefendMyPrivacy.org sent a letter to Pittsburgh Public Schools Friday that asks it to reject a proposed policy that would allow children to use bathrooms of the opposite sex. The letter provides a suggested policy that addresses the school district’s concerns about discrimination without opening restrooms, showers, and locker rooms to opposite-sex usage.

The letter explains that no law requires public schools to allow boys into girls’ restrooms or girls into boys’ restrooms. In fact, a federal court in Pittsburgh last year upheld a University of Pittsburgh policy that required students to use restrooms and locker rooms that correspond to their biological sex. The letter also warns that the district could be exposing itself to legal liability for violating the right of students to bodily privacy.

“Protecting young children from inappropriate exposure to members of the opposite sex is not only legal, it’s an important duty of officials who watch over our children,” said ADF Legal Counsel Matt Sharp. “Letting boys into girls’ bathrooms is an invasion of privacy and a threat to children’s safety. The school district is actually subjecting itself to potential liability if any of these children encounter any harm.”

The ADF letters cite pertinent legal precedent, including court rulings that support the ability of public schools to limit restrooms and locker rooms to members of the same sex for privacy and safety reasons without violating Title IX, a federal law concerning sex discrimination in public school programs and activities.

Title IX and its regulations specifically state that a school receiving federal funds can “provide separate toilet, locker room, and shower facilities on the basis of sex” without putting that funding at risk.

“Allowing students to use opposite-sex restrooms and locker rooms would seriously endanger students’ privacy and safety, undermine parental authority, violate religious students’ free exercise rights, and severely impair an environment conducive to learning…,” the letter explains. “ADF’s policy allows your District to accommodate students with unique privacy needs, including transgender students, while also protecting other students’ privacy and free exercise rights, and parents’ right to educate their children.”

“Each child deserves a safe space, and it’s our duty as parents to fight for their right to privacy,” added DefendMyPrivacy.org representative Carla D’Addesi. “Schools can accommodate students that have different preferences without compromising the rights and completely understandable needs of other children and their parents. No child should be forced into an intimate setting—like a bathroom or a locker room—with a person of the opposite sex.”

Alliance Defending Freedom is an alliance-building, non-profit legal organization that advocates for the right of people to freely live out their faith.

# # #

Legal Documents


Related Resources

ABOUT Matt Sharp

Matt Sharp serves as senior counsel with Alliance Defending Freedom, where he is the director of the Center for Public Policy. In this role, he leads ADF's team of policy experts as they craft legislation and advise government officials on policies that promote free speech, religious freedom, parental rights, and the sanctity of human life. Since joining ADF in 2010, Sharp has authored federal and state legislation, regularly provides testimony and legal analysis on how proposed legislation will impact constitutional freedoms, and advises governors, legislators, and state and national policy organizations on the importance of laws and policies that protect First Amendment rights. He has twice testified before the U.S. Congress on the importance of protecting free speech and religious liberty in federal law. Sharp also authored an amicus brief to the U.S. Supreme Court on behalf of nearly 9,000 students, parents, and community members asking the court to uphold students’ right to privacy against government intrusion. Sharp earned his J.D. in 2006 from the Vanderbilt University School of Law. A member of the bar in Georgia and Tennessee, he is also admitted to practice in several federal courts.