Skip to main content

Elmbrook School District v. Doe

Description:  Fearing a cramped, wooden-benched, and un-air conditioned gymnasium would ruin their big day, high school seniors in the Elmbrook School District looked for an alternative venue in which to hold their graduation exercises. They asked to move to the nearby Elmbrook Church building because it could easily accommodate all of their guests (even those with disabilities) and offered amenities like cushioned seating, free parking, and temperature control. The rental price of the church was also less expensive than holding the graduation ceremony in the school’s antiquated gym. District officials agreed and rented the church for graduation ceremonies until the completion of a public school facility that offered similar creature comforts. After that, graduations were held on school grounds. Some offended current and former students and their parents, represented by attorneys with Americans United for Separation of Church and State, filed suit.


Monday, Jun 16, 2014
The following quote may be attributed to Alliance Defending Freedom Senior Counsel David Cortman regarding the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision Monday to let stand a U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit ruling in Elmbrook School District v. Doe, which prohibited a public school district from renting a church facility for graduation ceremonies:

“Church buildings should not be treated like toxic warehouses simply because they normally house religious activities. That has never been the intent of the First Amendment. On the contrary, as Justices Scalia and Thomas remark in their dissent, the Elmbrook School District did not violate the Constitution, and the 7th Circuit’s bad decision in this case clearly conflicts with the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in Town of Greece v. Galloway, which stated that mere ‘offense…does not equate to coercion.’ For these and other reasons, we hope the Supreme Court will clearly affirm in a future case that government neutrality toward religion is not achieved by treating it like asbestos in the ceiling tiles of society.”

Alliance Defending Freedom is an alliance-building, non-profit legal organization that advocates for the right of people to freely live out their faith.
 
# # # | Ref. 39043

Commentary


Previous News Releases

Legal Documents

7th Circuit panel opinion: Elmbrook School District v. Doe
7th Circuit en banc opinion: Elmbrook School District v. Doe
Friend-of-the-court brief: Elmbrook School District v. Doe
U.S. Supreme Court dissent from denial: Elmbrook School District v. Doe

Related Resources

ABOUT David Cortman

David A. Cortman serves as senior counsel and vice president of U.S. litigation with Alliance Defending Freedom. He has been practicing law since 1996, and currently supervises a team of over 40 attorneys and legal staff who specialize in constitutional law, focusing on religious freedom, sanctity of life, and marriage and family. Cortman has litigated hundreds of constitutional law cases including two victories at the U.S. Supreme Court. In Trinity Lutheran Church v. Comer, he secured a 7-2 victory that overturned Missouri’s denial of a religious school’s participation in a state funding program. Cortman also argued Reed v. Town of Gilbert, securing a 9-0 ruling that prohibits the government from discriminating against religious speech. A member of the bar in Georgia, Florida, Arizona, and the District of Columbia, he is also admitted to practice in over two dozen federal courts, including the U.S. Supreme Court. Cortman obtained his J.D. magna cum laude from Regent University School of Law.