The Children First Foundation v. Fiala
Description: The Children First Foundation, through its ADF attorneys, filed suit against the New York Department of Motor Vehicles in 2004 for rejecting the pro-adoption group’s application to sponsor a “Choose Life” specialty plate as part of a state program.
NY 'Choose Life' license plates vindicated
Wednesday, Nov 9, 2011
ADF attorney sound bite: Jeff Shafer
ALBANY, N.Y. — A federal court ruled Tuesday that the state of New York violated the First Amendment when it rejected a pro-adoption group’s application to sponsor a “Choose Life” specialty license plate as part of a state program. Alliance Defense Fund attorneys filed the lawsuit on behalf of The Children First Foundation in 2004.
“Pro-adoption organizations have the right to a specialty license plate on the same terms as any other organization, and the court’s decision affirms that,” said ADF Senior Legal Counsel Jeff Shafer. “The state is not authorized to censor The Children First Foundation for its life-affirming viewpoint, but it has gotten away with doing so for 10 years now since the application was first submitted.”
The court issued an order for the state to approve the plate application but placed the order on hold until any appeals are completed.
“It is undisputed that CFF complied with the requirements for entry into the program…,” the court wrote. “As this court has found, the sole basis for Defendants’ denial of CFF’s license plate application was viewpoint discrimination. Accordingly, the court finds that Defendants’ restriction was both discrimination based on viewpoint and unreasonable….”
In addition, the court found that “New York has run afoul of the First Amendment by giving the Commissioner unbridled discretion to engage in viewpoint discrimination.”
The New York DMV had rejected the foundation’s license plate design of a crayon drawing of a yellow sun behind the faces of two smiling children, claiming a significant segment of the population would consider the design “patently offensive” because it also included the words “Choose Life.”
ADF attorneys filed The Children First Foundation v. Martinez with the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of New York in August 2004. In March 2006, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit ruled the lawsuit could go forward after the district court denied the state’s motion to dismiss the case. Malta attorney Jim Trainor, one of nearly 2,100 attorneys in the ADF alliance, is currently serving as local counsel.
ADF represented The Children First Foundation in a similar lawsuit in New Jersey. In that case, the state eventually agreed to approve the “Choose Life” plate after the foundation won reinstatement of its lawsuit at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit.
“Pro-adoption organizations have the right to a specialty license plate on the same terms as any other organization, and the court’s decision affirms that,” said ADF Senior Legal Counsel Jeff Shafer. “The state is not authorized to censor The Children First Foundation for its life-affirming viewpoint, but it has gotten away with doing so for 10 years now since the application was first submitted.”
The court issued an order for the state to approve the plate application but placed the order on hold until any appeals are completed.
“It is undisputed that CFF complied with the requirements for entry into the program…,” the court wrote. “As this court has found, the sole basis for Defendants’ denial of CFF’s license plate application was viewpoint discrimination. Accordingly, the court finds that Defendants’ restriction was both discrimination based on viewpoint and unreasonable….”
In addition, the court found that “New York has run afoul of the First Amendment by giving the Commissioner unbridled discretion to engage in viewpoint discrimination.”
The New York DMV had rejected the foundation’s license plate design of a crayon drawing of a yellow sun behind the faces of two smiling children, claiming a significant segment of the population would consider the design “patently offensive” because it also included the words “Choose Life.”
ADF attorneys filed The Children First Foundation v. Martinez with the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of New York in August 2004. In March 2006, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit ruled the lawsuit could go forward after the district court denied the state’s motion to dismiss the case. Malta attorney Jim Trainor, one of nearly 2,100 attorneys in the ADF alliance, is currently serving as local counsel.
ADF represented The Children First Foundation in a similar lawsuit in New Jersey. In that case, the state eventually agreed to approve the “Choose Life” plate after the foundation won reinstatement of its lawsuit at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit.
- Pronunciation guide: Shafer (SHAY’-fur)
ADF is a legal alliance of Christian attorneys and like-minded organizations defending the right of people to freely live out their faith. Launched in 1994, ADF employs a unique combination of strategy, training, funding, and litigation to protect and preserve religious liberty, the sanctity of life, marriage, and the family.
www.adfmedia.org | twitter.com/adfmedia | Ref. 5746
Legal Documents
Petition for rehearing: The Children First Foundation v. Fiala
Amended complaint: The Children First Foundation v. Martinez
2nd Circuit order on motion to dismiss: The Children First Foundation v. Martinez
Summary judgment decision and order: The Children First Foundation v. Martinez
2nd Circuit opinion: The Children First Foundation v. Fiala
Opposition to petition for rehearing: The Children First Foundation v. Fiala
Opposition to petition for rehearing: The Children First Foundation v. Fiala
2nd Circuit order granting rehearing: The Children First Foundation v. Fiala